What Is Media Bias/Fact Check Used For: Features, Reviews & Alternatives

MBFC employs a specific methodology involving human analysis of articles, headlines, sourcing, and editorial stances. Bias is assessed by identifying consistent ideological leanings, while factual reporting evaluates adherence to journalistic standards, use of loaded language, and accuracy of claims, cross-referenced with other fact-checkers. The full methodology is detailed on the website.

Yes, users can submit requests for new sources to be reviewed through a dedicated submission form on the website. For existing ratings, MBFC provides a process for submitting feedback or evidence to dispute a rating, which is then reviewed by their team for potential updates or corrections.

MBFC states it is an independent organization, not affiliated with any political party, PAC, or lobbying group. Its funding primarily comes from advertising, donations, and subscriptions, which are disclosed to maintain transparency and avoid conflicts of interest.

Source ratings are not on a fixed re-evaluation schedule. Updates occur when significant changes in a source's editorial policy, ownership, or consistent reporting patterns are observed, or when new evidence warrants a re-assessment. Users can often see a 'last updated' date on individual source profiles.

While MBFC does include some international news sources, its primary focus and most extensive coverage are on U.S.-based media outlets. The methodology is largely tailored to the U.S. political and media landscape, though efforts are made to apply consistent standards where applicable to global sources.